Thomas Daiber

Thomas Daiber, Dr. phil. habil., Full Professor of Slavic Linguistics and Cultural Science, Justus Liebig-University, Gießen, Germany.

Slavic Linguistics and Cultural Science
Germany

Zur Pragmatik transzendentaler Sprechakte. Am Beispiel von altkirchenslavisch тако ми

Върху прагматиката на трансцендентните речеви актове: въз основа на староцърковнославянското „тако ми“

  • Summary/Abstract

    Speech acts like to pray, to swear or to make a prophecy include a transcendental participant to be felicitous. In a prayer the transcendental participant is included as interlocutor, in an oath as witness and, if necessary, punishing force, in a blessing as guarantor, and prophecy consists either in reporting the statements of a transcendental actor or a human speaker is making statements on his behalf. The illocution of a transcendental speech act is highly depend on introductory assumptions, especially sincerity. Accordingly, the linguistic classification of oath shifts between assertive and commissive speech acts. Our paper firstly discusses problems of the pragmatic classification of oaths in general; in a second step it is demonstrated, that the use of the Old Church Slavonic oath-formula „tako mi‟ and its descendants in Church Slavonic and in today’s oral speech are located within a pragmatic continuum between (transcendental) oath – extreme assertion – appellative request – emphatic salutation. The pragmatic classification of the formula is highly depend on register and substitution of the original 1st person pronoun (mi) by 2nd person pronoun (ti). Additionally, the paper offers a linguistic explanation about the original shape of the Old Church Slavonic formula in comparison with corresponding Greek utterances.

    Subject: Scripta

Emphase in altkirchenslavischen Konstruktionen mit l-Partizip

Emphasis in Old Church Slavonic constructions with l-participle

  • Summary/Abstract

    The paper analyses the different ways, lexical information can be positioned relative to the two parts of the Old Church Slavonic periphrastic perfect tense, formed by auxiliary быти + l-participle. We find that positioning of information before or behind the construction is most open to rhetoric-stylistic shaping of the utterances in a given context. Positioning of information within the periphrastic construction leads to focus steering; insertion of information of different kind into the periphrastic construction can be interpreted not so much as focus steering towards rhematic, but towards emphasized information. Complex forms of information positioning are a sign of written conceptuality.

    Subject: Scripta

Subscribe to Thomas Daiber