Noe–sis and Die–ge–sis: the Theory of Asystata and the Narrative in Ancient Rhetorical Treatises

This study delves into the common attributes of criteria used to pinpoint invalidity in theses and implausibility in narratives within ancient rhetoric. To achieve this, a comparative analysis is undertaken between the various types of invalid or insoluble issues (asystata) outlined in the “stasis” theory and the theory of coherent narrative as presented in the four key treatises on rhetorical exercises (progymnasmata). These two conceptual frameworks, developed in tandem throughout post-classical Antiquity, are built upon the firm foundation of Aristotle’s logic and find practical application in contexts such as persuasive communication, historical narration, and literary fiction. The study’s findings highlight the shared terminological framework and educational objectives of both theories, fostering critical thinking and enhancing communicative proficiency among students of rhetoric. The article concludes with a comparative table juxtaposing the criteria for inconsistency and incoherence, viewed as breaches of the Principles of Identity, Non-Contradiction, and Sufficient Reason, providing a practical tool for analyzing and improving narratives.